Emeritus professor, School of Architectural Engineering, National Technical University of Athens
*Correspondence: eefesiou@arch.ntua.gr
Received: May 2025 | Accepted: May 2025 | Published: July 2025
Abstract
Municipal waste composition provides an essential basis for source-separation planning, but its usefulness depends on the boundary of measurement and the conditions under which materials can actually be collected and recovered. This article develops a critical comparative synthesis of published evidence for Accra, Dhaka, and New York City, with Milan used as a supporting implementation example. It draws exclusively on literature published before 1 December 2024 and distinguishes original measurements from subsequent interpretation. The selected studies describe different populations, collection streams, dates, and material categories; their percentages therefore support conditional planning judgments rather than a statistical ranking of cities. The analysis connects composition to service coverage, material capture, contamination, treatment acceptance, institutional responsibilities, and distributional effects. Its contribution is a comparative decision framework that connects heterogeneous composition evidence to explicit collection and treatment assumptions, distinguishing material present from material captured and accepted into a specified process. An explicitly hypothetical calculation demonstrates why a large organic fraction can yield less usable material than a smaller fraction served by a more effective collection system. The article proposes differentiated collection arrangements, measurement at several points in the service chain, and staged investment tied to demonstrated performance. Composition remains indispensable, yet its planning value emerges through its combination with evidence about buildings, collection reliability, existing recovery practices, and downstream demand. Source separation should consequently be designed as a material-specific public service whose performance is assessed through accepted target throughput, documented product destinations, and equitable access, alongside waste prevention.
Keywords: municipal solid waste; waste characterization; source separation; organic waste; comparative urban analysis; collection planning
Citation
Efesiou I. (2025). Municipal Waste Composition and Its Implications for Source-Separation Planning in Selected Cities. Paragraphs Environmental Design, 3(3), 60–78. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.24161341
References
- Afroz, R. (2011). Sustainable household waste management improvement in Dhaka city, Bangladesh. International Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development, 10(4), 433–448. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJESD.2011.047775
- Alamgir, M., & Ahsan, A. (2007). Municipal solid waste and recovery potential: Bangladesh perspective. Iranian Journal of Environmental Health Science & Engineering, 4(2), 67–76. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?doi=53cb283fab728ca7c50eb5a871b6bc231aaae01b&repid=rep1&type=pdf
- Alhassan, H., Asante, F. A., Oteng-Ababio, M., & Bawakyillenuo, S. (2018). Application of theory of planned behaviour to households’ source separation behaviour in Ghana. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 29(4), 704–721. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-10-2017-0122
- Bernstad, A. (2014). Household food waste separation behavior and the importance of convenience. Waste Management, 34(7), 1317–1323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2014.03.013
- Bernstad, A., & la Cour Jansen, J. (2012). Review of comparative LCAs of food waste management systems—Current status and potential improvements. Waste Management, 32(12), 2439–2455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023
- Bernstad Saraiva Schott, A., & Andersson, T. (2015). Food waste minimization from a life-cycle perspective. Journal of Environmental Management, 147, 219–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.07.048
- Cimpan, C., Maul, A., Jansen, M., Pretz, T., & Wenzel, H. (2015). Central sorting and recovery of MSW recyclable materials: A review of technological state-of-the-art, cases, practice and implications for materials recycling. Journal of Environmental Management, 156, 181–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.03.025
- Cimpan, C., Rothmann, M., Hamelin, L., & Wenzel, H. (2015). Towards increased recycling of household waste: Documenting cascading effects and material efficiency of commingled recyclables and biowaste collection. Journal of Environmental Management, 157, 69–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.04.008
- Dahlén, L., & Lagerkvist, A. (2008). Methods for household waste composition studies. Waste Management, 28(7), 1100–1112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2007.08.014
- Edjabou, M. E., Jensen, M. B., Götze, R., Pivnenko, K., Petersen, C., Scheutz, C., & Astrup, T. F. (2015). Municipal solid waste composition: Sampling methodology, statistical analyses, and case study evaluation. Waste Management, 36, 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2014.11.009
- Kaza, S., Yao, L., Bhada-Tata, P., & Van Woerden, F. (2018). What a waste 2.0: A global snapshot of solid waste management to 2050. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1329-0
- Miezah, K., Obiri-Danso, K., Kádár, Z., Fei-Baffoe, B., & Mensah, M. Y. (2015). Municipal solid waste characterization and quantification as a measure towards effective waste management in Ghana. Waste Management, 46, 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2015.09.009
- New York City Department of Sanitation. (2018). 2017 NYC residential, school, and NYCHA waste characterization study. https://www.nyc.gov/assets/dsny/downloads/resources/reports/waste-characterization-studies/2017/wcs-2017.pdf
- Petrone, P., & Vismara, D. (2014). The separate collection of residential organic waste in the city of Milan (Italy) [Conference abstract]. In Abstracts of oral presentations on the ORBIT 2014 scientific conference (pp. 18–19). https://upcommons.upc.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/59f5a90e-7889-489e-b297-6131e3b7f5f8/content
- Rousta, K., Bolton, K., Lundin, M., & Dahlén, L. (2015). Quantitative assessment of distance to collection point and improved sorting information on source separation of household waste. Waste Management, 40, 22–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2015.03.005
- United Nations Environment Programme. (2024a). Food waste index report 2024: Think eat save—Tracking progress to halve global food waste. https://wedocs.unep.org/handle/20.500.11822/45230
- United Nations Environment Programme. (2024b). Global waste management outlook 2024: Beyond an age of waste—Turning rubbish into a resource. https://wedocs.unep.org/handle/20.500.11822/44939
- Weithmann, N., Möller, J. N., Löder, M. G. J., Piehl, S., Laforsch, C., & Freitag, R. (2018). Organic fertilizer as a vehicle for the entry of microplastic into the environment. Science Advances, 4(4), Article eaap8060. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aap8060
- Wilson, D. C., Rodic, L., Cowing, M. J., Velis, C. A., Whiteman, A. D., Scheinberg, A., Vilches, R., Masterson, D., Stretz, J., & Oelz, B. (2015). ‘Wasteaware’ benchmark indicators for integrated sustainable waste management in cities. Waste Management, 35, 329–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2014.10.006
- Wilson, D. C., Rodic, L., Scheinberg, A., Velis, C. A., & Alabaster, G. (2012). Comparative analysis of solid waste management in 20 cities. Waste Management & Research, 30(3), 237–254. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X12437569
- Wilson, D. C., Velis, C., & Cheeseman, C. (2006). Role of informal sector recycling in waste management in developing countries. Habitat International, 30(4), 797–808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2005.09.005
- Yoada, R. M., Chirawurah, D., & Adongo, P. B. (2014). Domestic waste disposal practice and perceptions of private sector waste management in urban Accra. BMC Public Health, 14, Article 697. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-697
- Zurbrügg, C., Drescher, S., Rytz, I., Sinha, A. H. M. M., & Enayetullah, I. (2005). Decentralised composting in Bangladesh, a win-win situation for all stakeholders. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 43(3), 281–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2004.06.005
